Barack Obama / Obama / Rule of law & crime

Mérida: inherited cooperation, rule-of-law revision and incomplete outcome measures

2009–2010 · inherited program

Equipment and training delivered · outcome measures incomplete

Historical case snapshot · reviewed

Published · Visual edition October 6, 2026

Compare this case
2009SELECTED CASE START YEARRule of law & crime01Goal02Action03Result04Open questionsGOAL / ACTION / RESULT / LIMITS — FOUR QUESTIONS, NO SCORE

PUBLICATION-MADE RECORD DIAGRAM

Visual guide: Mérida: inherited cooperation, rule-of-law revision and incomplete outcome measures. U.S. Government Accountability Office and the linked official records supply the evidence below. This diagram is not a photograph, chronology of legal effect or measure of success.

Context & scope

The initiative began under George W. Bush in October 2007, with initial funding law in June 2008. Obama continued implementation and revised the goals with Mexico in 2009. This is the July 2010 oversight snapshot.

Goal

The 2009 four-pillar revision included disrupting organized criminal groups and institutionalizing reforms to sustain the rule of law and respect for human rights.

Action

The Obama administration continued the initiative and revised its goals with Mexico. GAO documented five Bell helicopters delivered in December 2009 and 4,392 public-safety investigators trained from July 2009 to January 2010.

Established result

Training and equipment delivery are confirmed implementation outputs. GAO found that State generally lacked indicators to measure program outcomes and that most indicators counted outputs such as officials trained, limiting assessment of the initiative’s effect on crime or institutional performance.

Cost / open questions

As of March 31, 2010, 46 percent of fiscal-year 2008–2010 Mérida funds had been obligated and about 9 percent expended. Almost all performance measures lacked measurable targets and milestones. Equipment delivery and a rule-of-law objective do not establish reduced violence or successful use of training.

OFFICIAL EVIDENCE / FULL SOURCE REGISTER

Open the sources.

Source dates identify the original publication, document or stated vintage. The review date identifies when this edition examined that evidence.